Jim/Jon - Yes that is how we understood it as well - and what the registry shows. Tom though was very clear that the boat in question was a Fsh and not a Marlin - he called it a long cabined version but was different then a Marlin. I have my doubts as well...as the builders record does not reflect a third type of Fish/Marlin. Of course as Steve noted, someone could have modified a Fish later on...
